Home / Resources

Resources

Reference material for rights holders: how copyright actually works, what a valid notice contains, and how to preserve evidence before you complain.

Reference 01

Copyright, in the parts that matter

Copyright protects original works fixed in a tangible form — a photograph saved to a card, a track bounced to a file, a document typed and stored. It protects the expression, not the underlying idea. Two photographers can shoot the same landmark; neither owns the landmark.

It starts automatically

Under the Berne Convention, protection arises on creation. No registration, no notice, no fee, no filing. This applies across all contracting states, which is most of the world. Registration still has value in specific jurisdictions — notably the United States, where it affects your ability to sue and to claim statutory damages — but it is not what creates the right.

What the right actually contains

Right	What it lets you control
Reproduction	Whether copies of the work can be made at all
Distribution	Whether copies can be sold, rented or otherwise circulated
Communication to the public	Whether the work can be uploaded, streamed or broadcast
Adaptation	Whether derivative works, edits or translations can be made
Public performance	Whether the work can be performed or displayed publicly
Moral rights	Attribution, and objection to distortion — in many jurisdictions these cannot be sold away

Where it stops

Most systems carve out uses that would otherwise infringe: criticism and review, news reporting, quotation, teaching and research, parody, and incidental inclusion. The United States frames this as fair use and weighs four factors — purpose, nature of the work, amount taken, and market effect. The UK, the EU and much of the Gulf use narrower, enumerated fair dealing exceptions instead. Neither is a blanket permission, and neither turns on whether credit was given.

Three things people get wrong

Credit is not a licence. Naming you does not create permission unless your licence terms say it does.
Non-commercial is not automatically fair. It weighs in the analysis; it does not decide it.
Publicly available is not public domain. Being reachable without a password says nothing about the rights attached.

Reference 02

The takedown notice

The notice-and-takedown mechanism comes from section 512 of the United States Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and its shape has been adopted well beyond US borders because the largest platforms are US-based. A valid notice generally has to contain six things.

A physical or electronic signature from the rights holder or an authorised agent.
Identification of the copyrighted work being claimed.
Identification of the infringing material, specific enough that the recipient can locate it — a full URL, not a homepage.
Contact details for the complaining party.
A statement of good-faith belief that the use is not authorised by the rights holder, its agent, or the law.
A statement, under penalty of perjury, that the information is accurate and that you are authorised to act.

The counter-notice

The person whose content was removed can file a counter-notice asserting the removal was mistaken. If they do, the material can be restored unless the rights holder files a court action within a set window — ten to fourteen business days under the US framework. This is the point at which a weak claim becomes visible, which is why the ownership check at intake matters so much.

Misrepresentation cuts both ways

Section 512(f) creates liability for knowingly making a material misrepresentation in a notice. Filing against material you do not own, or against a use you know is lawful, is not a free action. Serial false filers also lose their standing with platform rights portals, which is the practical penalty that bites first.

Outside the United States

The EU operates under the Digital Services Act and Article 17 of the Copyright Directive; the UK under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act with its own hosting-liability rules; the UAE under Federal Decree-Law No. 38 of 2021 on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, alongside its cybercrime provisions. The details differ. The practical route — identify the host, serve a documented notice, escalate upstream — is broadly the same everywhere.

Reference 03

Preserving evidence before you complain

The single most common mistake is contacting the infringer first. The page comes down, the account is deleted, and the proof goes with it — along with any chance of pursuing the matter further. Capture first. Complain second.

Capture, in this order

Full-page screenshot including the browser address bar and a visible system clock or date.
The complete URL, copied as text, not retyped from a screenshot.
Saved page source — use your browser's "save page complete" option, which preserves embedded assets.
A public archive snapshot, submitted to a third-party web archive so the record does not rest solely with you.
Account details — handle, display name, profile URL, and the posting date shown.
Your own proof of authorship — original RAW or project files with embedded metadata, publication records, client contracts, delivery emails.

What makes ownership provable

Layered project files and camera-original files carry creation metadata that a downloaded copy does not. Dated correspondence, invoices, delivery notes and commissioning contracts establish the chain. If you assigned or licensed the work to someone else, that document decides who is entitled to file — sometimes it is no longer you.

Reference 04

Glossary

Assignment	Permanent transfer of ownership in a work to another party. Different from a licence, which grants use while ownership stays put.
Berne Convention	The international treaty establishing that copyright arises automatically and is recognised across member states without formality.
Counter-notice	A formal response asserting that removed material was taken down in error, which can trigger restoration.
Derivative work	A new work based on an existing one — a translation, adaptation, remix or edit. Making one requires permission.
Fair dealing	The narrower, list-based exception model used in the UK, the Gulf and Commonwealth jurisdictions.
Fair use	The US four-factor test for whether an otherwise infringing use is permitted.
Moral rights	The creator's right to attribution and to object to derogatory treatment. In many jurisdictions these cannot be sold.
Orphan work	A work still in copyright whose owner cannot be identified or located.
Public domain	Works whose protection has expired or been waived. Not the same as freely accessible.
Safe harbour	The provision shielding a host from liability for user content, on condition it removes infringing material once properly notified.
UDRP	The arbitration procedure for recovering domain names registered in bad faith against a trade mark.
WIPO	The World Intellectual Property Organization, the UN agency administering the international IP treaty framework.

Note. These pages are general reference material, written to be useful rather than exhaustive. They are not legal advice and law varies by jurisdiction. For your specific position, consult a qualified lawyer.

Found a copy of your work?

Capture it before you contact anyone. Then send it to us and we will tell you what you are dealing with.

File an infringement report